For Further Information Contact: ~Director~ Nancee email ~Advocates~ Barb~email Susan~email Vickie~email ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Quick Start for Foster Parents Falsely Accused Standing in the Shadow of the Law ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Little Known “DIRTY TRICKS” of DCFS/CPS/DSS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the News ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Blue-ribbon panel urges reform of California foster care system By Evelyn Nieves The Associated Press Saturday, August 16, 2008 SAN FRANCISCO — California's nearly 80,000 foster children are underserved by overburdened courts and agencies making life-changing decisions for them and often end up in limbo, according to a report released Friday. The state's foster care system, the largest in the nation and representing 15 to 20 percent of all foster children, is simply overwhelmed, according to a report by the California Blue Ribbon Commission on Children in Foster Care. The panel was appointed by California Chief Justice Ronald George to study the courts' role in these cases and recommend reforms. In a two-year study, the panel found serious consequences resulting from the lack of time foster cases receive in court. The entire juvenile court system has fewer than 150 full- and part-time judges and commissioners working on foster care, with caseloads averaging 1,000. Lawyers for these courts average 273 cases apiece — in some counties 500 to 600 cases — and often do not meet the children and parents they are representing until moments before their hearings. The panel found that hearings last an average of 10 to 15 minutes, and that delays and continuances are common. Children also are often shifted from placement to placement. More than half of the state's 80,000 foster children remain in the system for two or more years, 17 percent for more than three years. About 5,000 foster care children reach the age of 18 and are termed out of the system — set loose in the world — without reuniting with their families or getting placed in other permanent homes. "That's simply unconscionable," said Carlos Moreno, the commission chairman and a state Supreme Court associate justice. Moreno presented the panel's findings and recommendations in San Francisco on Friday to the state Judicial Council, the policymaking body for the state's judiciary. Afterward, the Judicial Council unanimously endorsed the commission's recommendations, which focused on several key areas: preventing the removal of children from their families, when it is safe to do so; reforming the courts to give cases more priority and assign more judges to hear them; improving coordination between the courts and social service agencies; and providing more resources and funding to the juvenile courts by being more flexible with funds. "No child — no family — should be denied critical services because of financial restraints," said Moreno, who noted that children who grow up in foster care are more likely to end up as burdened adults — jobless, homeless and in jail or prison. Ventura County has already taken many of the steps the state panel recommended, said Pattie Hunt, president of the Ventura County Foster Parent Association. "We do a lot of upfront work trying to keep the family in its home," said the Oak View foster mother who has cared for 71 babies, many drug-exposed. Hunt agreed that the court system needs to be improved. She said parents facing removal of their children need more time to meet with their attorneys before court hearings. Data was not immediately available Friday on the average caseloads for attorneys in Ventura County. But Tari Cody, the judge overseeing dependency court cases, has said that she reviews 800 to 1,000 abuse and neglect cases annually. Other findings and recommendations from the Blue Ribbon Commission include: Extending the age for children to receive foster care assistance from 18 to 21. Making strides to ensure that all participants in foster care hearings have their voices heard. Convening commissions at the county level that include court and child welfare agency personnel to resolve local concerns and implement the panel's recommendations. The Blue Ribbon Commission on Children in Foster Care was composed of 42 child welfare experts, legislators, court officials and foster youths. Their study was the first to focus on the role of the courts and their responsibility for foster children in California. — Star staff writer Kathleen Wilson contributed to this report. In the wake of the unanimous ruling of the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District to recognize homeschooling as a legal option in California, two of California’s most senior officials have given their opinion of the ruling. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger:“This is a victory for California’s students, parents and education community. This decision confirms the right every California child has to a quality education and the right parents have to decide what is best for their children. I hope the ruling settles this matter for parents and homeschooled children once and for all in California, but assure them that we, as elected officials, will continue to defend parents’ rights.” State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell:“I am pleased that the courts have clarified the right of California parents to homeschool their children. I have respected the right of parents to make educational decisions they feel are in the best interest of their children. I recognize and understand the consternation that the earlier court ruling caused for many parents and associations involved in homeschooling. It is my hope that today’s ruling will allay many of those fears and resolve much of the confusion.” HSLDA appreciates the efforts of these two officials as they were part of the group who defended the right of parents to homeschool before the Court of Appeal. By Marjie Lundstrom and Sam Stanton - mlundstrom@... Last Updated 10:32 pm PDT Friday, August 8, 2008 In the 16 days between the time 4-year-old Jahmaurae Allen was beaten to death and Sacramento Child Protective Services publicly released portions of its records this week, the case file was altered to change the original finding in the case, The Bee has learned. One early version of the report from the social worker, who began handling an allegation of abuse involving the 4-year-old on June 19, described the allegation as "unfounded," two sources who read the document told The Bee this week.Another version obtained by The Bee described the allegation of abuse of the little boy as "inconclusive." But the portions released by CPS to The Bee this week under a new public records law do not reflect either of those findings. Instead, those files indicate the allegations of abuse were "substantiated," a finding listed as being "effective 7/21/08" - the day Jahmaurae was beaten to death, allegedly by his mother's live-in boyfriend. A top county official said today she was unaware of the varying case files until The Bee raised questions, and that an inquiry had begun. "We're pulling computer records right now to find out what's happened," said Lynn Frank, director of the county's Health and Human Services department, which oversees CPS. The existence of differing versions of the case file sparked outrage among children's advocates who work closely with the agency. Some had been instrumental in getting the new California law passed, which forces county child welfare agencies to open the files of children who die on their watch. "This is unbelievable," said Robert Fellmeth, a law professor and director of the San Diego-based Children's Advocacy Institute, which backed the new disclosure law. "If you don't take the kid (from the home), the only check you have is this - the record of what you did or did not do...," he said. "If you start playing with that and altering that, you undermine the only check these kids have on failure to protect." Alarm over child welfare employees falsifying or backdating files has surfaced elsewhere. Last week in Philadelphia, criminal charges were filed against two social workers involved in a case that led to the starvation death of a disabled 14-year-old girl. Workers there were accused by the grand jury of falsifying documents after her death to make it appear as though they had performed their jobs properly. In New Jersey, a children's advocates group sued that state's child protection agency several years ago for allegedly ordering case files to be altered. "If this is what happened (in Sacramento), whoever did it and whoever ordered it should be fired immediately," said Richard Wexler, executive director of the Virginia-based National Coalition for Child Protection Reform. "It's dishonest," he said. "It's covering up the extent of whatever errors may have been, and that endangers the next child." Jahmaurae's death has spawned a Sacramento County grand jury probe of CPS, and the agency itself said Tuesday it was planning to have an independent review of CPS conducted. CPS has conceded that it should have done more to protect Jahmaurae before he was killed, and suspended the social worker in the case. At the time, the agency said the social worker "worked in isolation and did not follow established department procedures, such as: required contact with reporting party; required contact with medical personnel; required contact with persons who may have knowledge of the family; and reviewing the case with the supervisor." Sources familiar with the case say the social worker's entries and narrative about what happened were not accessible until after Jahmaurae was killed. It remains unclear who completed portions of the file. CPS documents show the social worker evaluated the case after a doctor reported to the agency June 17 that Jahmaurae might be the victim of physical abuse. That doctor reported finding a painful swelling and bruise on the boy's chest the size of an adult fist. CPS documents indicate the social worker tried to contact the boy and his mother on June 19, going to their Foothill Farms apartment. The worker went to the wrong apartment at first, the documents state, and when she found the right apartment no one was home. She left her card on the door and returned to make another attempt at contact June 21, the documents state, and left her card again. http://www.sacbee.com/1089/story/1143293.html Back to Top ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bills Signed by Governor 2005-2006 Sessions AB 2216 – Child Welfare Leadership-Intro. Feb. 22, 2006-Text of Bill Karen Bass (D-Baldwin Hills) Co-sponsored by NCYL, Children's Advocacy Institute, the Children's Law Center of Los Angeles Establishes a Child Welfare Leadership Council, within the Health and Human Services Agency, to bring together the multiple agencies and departments that provide services to children and families in the child welfare system. AB 2480 – Appellate Representation for Foster Youth-Intro. Feb. 23, 2006-Text of Bill Noreen Evans (D-Santa Rosa) Co-sponsored by NCYL, Children's Advocacy Institute, the Children's Law Center of Los Angeles Assists in children accessing an attorney during dependency proceedings in the appellate courts. SB 1641 – Promoting Family-Like Environments for Foster Children-Intro. Feb. 24, 2006-Text of Bill Nell Soto (D-Pomona) Co-sponsored by NCYL and Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting Requires that foster care placements and day-to-day caregiver decisions for foster children be based on the “reasonable prudent parent” standard. This means that foster children and youth should be placed in homes that best promote a family-like environment and permit children to engage in reasonable day-to-day activities. AB 1641 also acknowledges the work of the Department of Social Services, Division of Community Care Licensing, in reviewing regulations and policies to ensure that they promote both well-being and safety of children, and requires a progress report to the Legislature at the regular 2007-08 budget hearings AB 2488 - Foster Youth Sibling Connections-Intro. Sept. 22, 2006-Text of Bill Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) Sponsored by the Children’s Law Center for Los Angeles Eliminates legal obstacles to youth searching for their siblings after one or more of them have been adopted. This legislation ensures that siblings are able to remain connected and find each other through a more accessible and streamlined process. AB 1979 – Promoting Mentorship-Intro. Feb. 9. 2006-Text of Bill Karen Bass (D-Baldwin Hills) Sponsored by the Los Angeles County Sheriff Promotes meaningful and lifelong connections between foster youth and mentors by waiving the fees for criminal background checks for mentors, thereby encouraging more Californians to become mentors. AB 2985 – Protecting Foster Youth from Identity Theft-Intro. Feb. 24, 2006-Text of Bill Bill Maze (R-Visalia) Requires county welfare departments to request credit checks for foster youth who are 16 or older and provide referrals to credit counseling organizations if the credit check discloses any negative information. AB 2195 – Placement With Relatives-Intro. Feb. 22, 2006-Text of Bill Karen Bass (D-Baldwin Hills) Sponsored by the County Welfare Directors Association Facilitates expedient and safe placements of foster youth with relatives when their primary foster parent or caregiver is suddenly unable to provide care. The law calls for establishing standards and procedures for counties to assess and approve relative providers on an emergency basis. SB 1667 – Parent Participation in Dependency Proceedings-Intro. Mar. 29, 2006-Text of Bill Sheila Kuehl (D-Santa Monica) Sponsored by Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting Promotes foster parent participation in dependency hearings by making sure they receive appropriate notices and forms, as well as information on how to provide input and recommendations to the court. AB 2781 – Regulation of Private Child Support Collectors-Intro. Feb. 24, 2006-Text of Bill Author Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) Sponsored by NCYL, Children's Advocacy Institute The bill requires a private child support collector to provide in a written contract notices and disclosures of consumer rights to parents receiving child support, as well as additional information about child support payments during the contract term. The new law also authorizes the parent to cancel any contract under certain circumstances; prescribes the rights of the parties with respect to child support agencies and other governmental entities; and outlines procedures and remedies for enforcement of the law. The new law also requires that every court order for child support issued beginning in 2010, and every child support agreement providing child support payments approved by the court beginning in 2010, include a separate money judgment owed by the parent receiving child support to the private child support collector. This money judgment would be in favor of the private collector and the custodial parent jointly. The bill also regulates the conduct and compensation of attorneys who are private child support collectors. |  |  |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Governor signs bill to improve rights for foster children in court By Karen de Sá Mercury News Article Launched: 07/22/2008 01:38:29 AM PDT Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger strengthened the rights of California's 80,000 children in foster care on Monday, signing a law that ensures greater opportunities for youths to be present in court hearings deciding the course of their lives - from where they will live to how often, if ever, they will see their families. The measure was introduced by Assemblyman Dave Jones, a Democrat from Sacramento, to address a major flaw in California's juvenile dependency courts throughout the state: Hearings routinely occur without the children whose lives are at stake. Their absence was one key problem highlighted in the February series in the Mercury News, "Broken Families, Broken Courts," that revealed deep dysfunction in the state dependency system, the largest in the nation. A commission appointed by Chief Justice Ronald George later reiterated the problem. The new law, which takes effect Jan. 1, calls for judicial officers to postpone hearings for children at least 10 years old if they have not been given notice and the chance to attend; while the law already called for children to be notified of hearings, it made no provision if the law was ignored. In a letter released to members of the California State Assembly who had voted unanimously for the bill, the governor said he "wholeheartedly" supports the goal of providing foster children with greater access to hearings. "I am signing this bill because the foster children of this state deserve to have a role in their futures, Schwarzenegger said." Governor's rebuke But he also sent a rebuke to local decision makers - the judges, lawyers and social workers who oversee such weighty matters as whether children will ever see their parents again, following allegations of abuse or neglect. Outside of Los Angeles, where the participation of children is an ingrained part of the local court culture, foster youths are routinely absent from hearings in their cases, the Mercury News investigation determined. Judges up and down the state revealed in interviews that they are unable to make the best decisions for children in foster care when they cannot see them, hear from them, and attach a name with a file, regardless of the age of the child. Schwarzenegger questioned "why the courts have not made such access a greater priority when it is allowed under current law. More likely than not the reason is lack of resources and overburdened court schedules, which this bill fails to address." He also cautioned that whatever costs the new law would incur, such as transportation expenses or social worker time, would have to be borne under existing budgets, in a time of fiscal crisis statewide. A triumphant Jones, the Assembly judiciary chairman, greeted the news of his bill's passage Monday afternoon by thanking the governor for signing the bill despite estimates by his staff that the bill would cost up to $900,000 a year. "These hearings are deciding the very futures of these children," said Jones. "It makes no sense whatsoever to deny them the opportunity to be there and participate. The costs of not doing so are enormous in terms of bad decisions about placements, further abuse and neglect, and broken lives." Jones said he was moved to act after reading in the Mercury News the story of former foster youth-turned-student activist Zairon Frazier of Alameda County. Frazier fought to attend all his court hearings but did so by his own sheer will and determination. Absent support, he traveled by bus and train to and from his court hearings, at times in the dark, alone and afraid. When he left the foster care system at age 18, his final "emancipation hearing" was held in his absence. No one bothered to change the date to avoid a scheduling conflict with his high school final exams. 'A duty' Frazier - now 21 and busy scraping together the money to attend the University of Hawaii by working three jobs - said he is elated to hear the path will be easier for foster youths now coming through the system. "I did not know the entire state senate would be voting on a story about what happened to me in foster care. I consider it an honor, it's very exciting," he said. "But I also consider it a duty. I'm a foster youth advocate, it's what I'm supposed to do. If something went wrong with you, change it so that it won't happen to anybody else." Last week, Schwarzenegger signed two other bills to improve the foster care system. One bill requires county welfare departments to provide youths aging out of the system with documents needed to obtain medical benefits and other social services, as well as family photographs and information regarding Indian heritage. A second bill strengthens the legal rights of foster youth who have children of their own while in the system. Back to Top Lieber Seeking Audit of Family Court System By Malcolm Maclachlan published Thursday, June 26, 2008 Link to Article Assemblywoman Sally Lieber, D-Mountain View, is circulating a letter asking the Joint Legislative Audit Committee (JLAC) for an audit of California's family court system and the way it handles child custody disputes.
The letter, addressed to JLAC chair Nell Soto, D-Pomona, raises numerous issues. It asks the JLAC to look into court appointees, such as mediators, investigators, therapists, and attorneys assigned to work on custody cases. It also cites "increasing evidence" that children are being placed with parents who are committing sexual abuse or domestic violence.
"This is something there have been concerns about over a number of years," Lieber said. "With the audit request, we're really trying to make sure we have a handle on what's going on in these cases."
The letter also cites eight counties where "large numbers of problematic cases appear to arise." At the top of this lists, are Sacramento and Marin, which is also the home of a group pushing for the audit. The Greenbrae-based Center for Judicial Excellence (CJE) has been circulating a 42-minute film called "Family Court Crisis: Our Children at Risk," to try to drum up interest in reforming family courts. They've also been testifying about the problems they see, most recently at a hearing last week in San Francisco of the California Commission on the Status of Women.
Attorney Beth Jordan, co-chair of the Family Law section of the Marin County Bar Association, characterized the CJE as a group of "disgruntled litigants" who are trying to use to political process to get the results the courts wouldn't give them. She represented the father in the case of litigant Rama Diop. Diop testified at the Women's Commission last week about the "bias, corruption and blatant disregard for the Law" that takes places in Marin.
Jordan does not contest that Diop was a poor, African-born mother fighting a case against a well-off American father. But she said Diop was represented by multiple attorneys through trials and appeals, was given adequate resources to state her case and made multiple attempts to get the judge thrown off the case. Diop now has joint custody.
"I'm sure she feels she was taken advantage of because she's a woman and she's poor and she's a person of color," Jordan said. She added, "I don't doubt in any way that the litigants believe what they're saying. I also think they make up a lot of things."
One of the things women often "make up," according to Jordan, is allegations of sexual abuse. This is often done with "questionable timing" as the mother is about to lose her case.
Attorneys and others associated with the CJE paint a very different picture. Kathleen Russell, a staff consultant to the CJE, said that you can find examples of the way things should be done very close to Marin and Sacramento counties-just go to next door to San Francisco or Yolo counties, respectively. In both cases, they said, these counties have far better records of following the law, taking all evidence into account and keeping children out of abusive situations.
"We have terrific laws and procedures put in place for the protection of families and children," said Barbara Kaufman, a family law attorney active with the CJE who represented Diop. "They're not being followed."
What's missing in many counties, both women say, is oversight and accountability. Russell said that in some counties the family courts have become "a racket." Testimony compiled by the CJE abounds with accounts of parents have to pay out tens of thousands of dollars to an attorney appointed to represent their child, who then meets with the child for a just a few hours over several years. Others tell of expensive "co-parenting" session with a therapist, in which a woman must pay to sit in a room with the man who has beaten her or her children, following the rules in hopes of getting their children back.
In rich counties like Marin, a well-off parent can use the courts to systematically destroy their ex-spouse, she said. Through repeated orders for expensive mediation, counseling and legal representation for their children, they are "systematically stripped of their resources."
Contrary to Jordan's claims, Russell added, many women hold back from raising abuse or violence allegations, lest the other side charge them "parental alienation syndrome" and try to use the charge to seek full custody.
"By the very act of raising these allegations, they're losing their kids," Russell said. The audit, she said, it merely trying to "create a culture of accountability."
Judge Verna Adams-who is Presiding Judge in Marin County Superior Court and Supervising Judge of their Family Law Division-said that her court is already audited regularly by the Judicial Council of California. Adams, who presided over Diop's case, said she is confident an audit will find no major problems. "In Marin we have a long history of well-funded special interest groups who are trying to exert political pressure on judges to rule in favor of parents who belong to these groups," Adams said. "This group (CJE) has been trying for months to find a legislator to carry legislation to change the family court structure in California. They're trying to influence a small number of cases in Marin. I can assure you that our judges are not going to succumb to this kind of pressure."
Lieber said that she is close to having several co-signers for the letter. Then the JLAC, which consists of seven Assemblymembers and seven Senators, would have to vote to approve the audit. The resulting work by the Bureau of State Audits would then take several months-by which time Lieber will have been termed out the Assembly.
But she said she has submitted bill language the Legislative Council in order to give a head start to any legislator who might like to take up the cause in the next session. This text focuses on changes she said would ensure accountability in the system, particularly when it comes to court appointees and allegations of violence or sexual abuse. If the audit does show major problems, Lieber said, a resulting bill could get widespread support.
"I think there could be republican votes for it, definitely," Lieber said. "And the governor has shown a real willingness to take on children's issues and domestic violence issue. So I think there is an open door there." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Reference: Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. We are not lawyers or affiliated with any lawyers shown. It the the responsibility of the user to check the accuracy and validity of this information. Please review these references for your state; join our Yahoo group; and/or contact a Representative shown in the left margin, for more specific information. - School Finder ~~Compare How Schools are Rated for the State
- Defacto Parents Status Request Form #JV-295 To be filed with the court
- Agency List
- Assembly Member Addresses
- PENAL CODE
- CALIFORNIA WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS CODE
- Attorney General Child Protective Program The Attorney General's Child Protection Program administers the Child Abuse Central Index, which was created by the Legislature in 1965 as a tool for state and local agencies to help protect the health and safety of California's children.
- Attorney General AG web page
- Civil Code
- Courts Legal Forms, Opinions and more
- Laws and Codes
- Governor Contact
- Office of the Attorney General: DOJ FAQs Child Protection Program
- Children and Family Services Division California's Web site
- Code of Regulations
- Department of Social Services
- State Homepage
- http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare/default.aspx Abuse Reporting now Hi-Tech
State Assembly~~Committee on Human Services Primary jurisdictions are child welfare services, foster care, adoption assistance, child care, nutrition programs, CalWORKs, Food Stamps, SSI/SSP, developmental disability services, Adult Protective Services, In-home Supportive Services and community care licensing. - Ombudsman Office Foster care Ombudsman office
- Ombudsman Program Foster Care Ombudsman Program
- Foster Care Policy and Procedure CDSS/Community Care Facilities Licensing Manuals
- Guide for Reporting Child Abuse(CACI) pdf File
- Inspector General Office
- Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting Publication material: LAPP’s Toolkit on Allegations of Maltreatment against California Foster Caregivers stresses the importance of safety for all children in foster care and explains the possible consequences of an allegation of maltreatment (abuse) by foster caregivers. Information on licensing violations and deficiencies, the California Child Abuse Central Index, and criminal investigations and charges is included.
- Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting The founders of Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting (LAPP) are experienced dependency lawyers who have cared for foster children in their own homes as foster, adoptive and kinship parents. LAPP attorneys were inspired by both their personal and professional experiences to create a program to ease the fostering, adoptive, and kinship experience for others.
- Legislature Start page
- Office of Administrative Law
- Official Calif Legislative Welcome to the official site for California legislative information.
- Online Manual of Policies and Procedures
- Senator's Address
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Other Groups with State References National or~~~~ References for all Back to Top If you are interested in joining our support group, use the link below to subscribe. God Bless, GranPa Chuck Any Links that Don't Work Please Contact Weekend WebMaster |